From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gourdine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 10, 1992

Appeal from the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.).


We find no abuse of discretion in County Court's determination that defendant be shackled during trial. Defendant's violent criminal history and reports that he intended to attack defense counsel provided a reasonable basis for the determination, and County Court articulated its reasoning on the record and instructed the jury to disregard the restraints (see, People v Freeman, 184 A.D.2d 864; People v Bosket, 168 A.D.2d 833, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 904; People v Greiner, 156 A.D.2d 813, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 919). We also find no basis to disturb the sentence of 3 1/2 to 7 years' imprisonment imposed by County Court given defendant's criminal history.

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Gourdine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 10, 1992
188 A.D.2d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Gourdine

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLARENCE GOURDINE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 741 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 537

Citing Cases

People v. Casey

The court factored defendant's prior criminal history, which included assaulting a correction officer with a…

People v. Casey

The court factored defendant's prior criminal history, which included assaulting a correction officer with a…