From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 1990
167 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 5, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the lineup was tainted because the detective told the two witnesses that he would be trying to apprehend the suspect and that when and if he did they would view a lineup. We disagree. The suggestion of a law enforcement official to a witness that the person identified in a photograph will be in a lineup does not by itself give rise to a substantial likelihood of misidentification (see, People v. Rodriguez, 64 N.Y.2d 738, 740-741; People v. Bolling, 142 A.D.2d 733; People v. Ballard, 140 A.D.2d 529; People v. Thomas, 133 A.D.2d 867). Similarly, in the case at bar, the detective's comment did not give rise to a substantive likelihood of misidentification. We also find that the lineup was not unduly suggestive (see, People v. Scott, 114 A.D.2d 915).

The testimony of the defendant's accomplice regarding defendant's prior criminal activity and drug use was proper since it was relevant to show his motive (see, People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233; People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264, 293; People v. Velez, 159 A.D.2d 665; People v. Johnson, 155 A.D.2d 924, 925). Moreover, in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt, any error was harmless (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 242).

The defendant's claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in choosing to reject a plea agreement and proceed to trial is based on matters dehors the record and is not reviewable on this appeal (see, People v. Hamlin, 153 A.D.2d 644; People v. Walker, 152 A.D.2d 644; People v. Reyes, 150 A.D.2d 620).

Finally, the defendant's remaining allegations of error are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit, or the errors are harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Hawkins, 55 N.Y.2d 474, cert. denied 459 U.S. 846; People v. Bailey, 155 A.D.2d 262; People v. Patterson, 106 A.D.2d 520; People v. Smith, 100 A.D.2d 857, 858; People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 241-242, supra). Brown, J.P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 1990
167 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Goodman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MILTON GOODMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

State v. Crossland

Considering the nature and scope of the inquiry, the defense counsel's presence was sufficient to safeguard…

People v. Yanes

In any event, the claim is without merit. Although, in general, evidence of uncharged crimes is not…