From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gooden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 2001
279 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued December 11, 2000.

January 16, 2001.

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Lefkowitz, J.), both rendered June 18, 1997, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under Indictment No. 1648/96 and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree under Indictment No. 3073/96, upon jury verdicts, and imposing sentences.

Alan Polsky, Bohemia, N.Y., for appellant.

James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney, Riverhead, N Y (Michael A. Gajdos of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment rendered under Indictment No. 1648/96 is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment rendered under Indictment No. 3073/96 is reversed, on the law, that indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

The County Court properly admitted testimony concerning the defendant' s prior uncharged criminal conduct since the testimony was relevant to establish that the defendant had a motive to attack the victim (see, People v. Ventimiglia, 52 N.Y.2d 350; People v. Till, 87 N.Y.2d 835).

With regard to Indictment No. 3073/96, which charged that the defendant criminally possessed a forged instrument in Suffolk County, the People did not present sufficient evidence to establish that the forged instrument was transported into Suffolk County as a result of the defendant's exercise of dominion and control (see, Penal Law § 10.00; People v. Manini, 79 N.Y.2d 561). Accordingly, the defendant's conviction of that crime must be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

The defendant's remaining contentions are either academic in light of our decision, or without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Gooden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 16, 2001
279 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Gooden

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. HOPETON GOODEN, APPELLANT. (IND. NOS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 16, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 533 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 882

Citing Cases

People v. Gooden

25)(Suffolk County Indictment 1648-1996), and sentenced to a term of ten years imprisonment with a mandatory…