From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 2008
53 A.D.3d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

July 1, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), entered June 12, 2006, which, after a hearing, inter alia, specified and informed the defendant that the court would impose a determinate sentence of imprisonment of 15 years in the event of a resentence pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738, § 23).

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Spolzino, Santucci, Angiolillo and Eng, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, to afford the defendant an opportunity to withdraw his application for resentencing before any resentence is imposed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not waive his right to challenge the proposed resentence as excessive (see People v Schreter, 50 AD3d 930; People v Love, 46 AD3d 919, lv denied 10 NY3d 842). However, taking into account all of the relevant circumstances (see People v Beasley, 47 AD3d 639), the proposed resentence is not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

Pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738, § 23), we remit this matter to the County Court, Westchester County, to afford the defendant an opportunity to withdraw his application for resentencing before any resentence is imposed.


Summaries of

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 2008
53 A.D.3d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHANNES GONZALEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 2008

Citations

53 A.D.3d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
859 N.Y.S.2d 569

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Here, the Legislature's determination that the reforms codified in CPL 440.46 should only apply to defendants…

People v. Sevencan

Ordered that the order is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to afford…