From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gonzales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 1990
168 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 13, 1990

Appeal from the County Court of Washington County (Leary, J.).


On December 24, 1987 defendant, an inmate at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County, was discovered during a routine search to be in possession of a toothbrush which had one end sharpened to a point. Following an investigation, defendant was indicted for the crime of promoting prison contraband in the first degree. Defendant was found guilty of this crime after a jury trial and was sentenced to a term of 3 1/2 to 7 years' imprisonment, which was to run consecutively to any term of imprisonment he was currently serving. This appeal followed.

We affirm. Although defendant advances several arguments in support of his request for reversal, none of them require extended discussion. Defendant's claim that he was wrongfully deprived of his right to testify before the Grand Jury that indicted him must fail because he waived that right by not making a motion to dismiss the indictment within five days after his arraignment (see, People v. Hamilton, 165 A.D.2d 908; People v. Sylvester, 165 A.D.2d 920). Defense counsel's alleged failure to secure an opportunity for defendant to testify before the Grand Jury did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel since no prejudice appeared to accrue to defendant (see, People v. Planthaber, 131 A.D.2d 927, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 803). The remaining error assigned to defense counsel by defendant did not amount to a lack of "meaningful representation" under all of the circumstances (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147). The right to meaningful representation does not include the right to flawless performance by counsel (see, People v. Alexander, 161 A.D.2d 1035).

Defendant's remaining arguments have been examined and have been found to be devoid of merit.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gonzales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 13, 1990
168 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE GONZALES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
564 N.Y.S.2d 210

Citing Cases

People v. Serna

The People were therefore not required to notify defendant of his right to appear (CPL 190.50; see, People v…

People v. Miles

Nor did his counsel's decision not to assert these issues constitute, as contended by defendant, the…