People v. Goldsmith

Full title: PEOPLE v. GOLDSMITH (Carmen).

Court: Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 9, 2012

143 Cal. Rptr. 3d 839 (Cal. 2012)

280 P.3d 535

Opinion

No. S201443.

2012-05-9

PEOPLE v. GOLDSMITH (Carmen).

Prior report: Cal.App., 138 Cal.Rptr.3d 305

Petition for review granted; issues limited.

The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following:

1. What testimony, if any, regarding the accuracy and reliability of the automated traffic enforcement system (ATES) is required as a prerequisite to admission of the ATES-generated evidence? 2. Is the ATES evidence hearsay and, if so, do any exceptions apply?

CANTIL–SAKAUYE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, CORRIGAN, and LIU, JJ., concur.