From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Golden

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 27, 2022
201 A.D.3d 1253 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

111088

01-27-2022

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Whitney GOLDEN, Appellant.

Stephen J. Carney, Schenectady, for appellant. Andrew J. Wylie, District Attorney, Plattsburgh (Jennifer C. Manning of counsel), for respondent.


Stephen J. Carney, Schenectady, for appellant.

Andrew J. Wylie, District Attorney, Plattsburgh (Jennifer C. Manning of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County (Favreau, J.), rendered January 10, 2019, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crimes of driving while under the influence of drugs and aggravated driving while intoxicated with a child passenger, and the traffic infractions of driving left of the pavement markings and failure to stop at a stop sign.

Defendant was charged in an indictment with the crimes of driving while under the influence of drugs and aggravated driving while intoxicated with a child passenger, and the traffic infractions of driving left of the pavement markings and failure to stop at a stop sign. Defendant pleaded guilty as charged and sentencing was left to County Court's discretion. County Court sentenced defendant to a one-year jail term for the conviction of driving while under the influence of drugs, conditionally discharged on her compliance with the conditions of her probation. Defendant was sentenced to six months in jail, to be followed by five years of probation, for the conviction of aggravated driving while intoxicated with a child passenger and fines were imposed on all of the charges to which defendant pleaded guilty. Defendant appeals.

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the sentence is harsh and excessive. "A sentence which falls within the statutory parameters will not be disturbed on appeal absent evidence of a clear abuse of discretion or the existence of extraordinary circumstances" ( People v. Sookram, 156 A.D.3d 1254, 1255, 65 N.Y.S.3d 813 [2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see People v. Hightower, 186 A.D.3d 926, 932, 128 N.Y.S.3d 699 [2020], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 1113, 133 N.Y.S.3d 522, 158 N.E.3d 539 [2020] ). Notably, defendant has a prior conviction for driving while ability impaired. Her sentencing exposure was significantly greater than the terms imposed. Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v. Ferguson, 193 A.D.3d 1253, 1259, 147 N.Y.S.3d 204 [2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 964, 148 N.Y.S.3d 763, 171 N.E.3d 239 [2021] ; People v. Wheeler, 159 A.D.3d 1138, 1144, 72 N.Y.S.3d 220 [2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 1123, 81 N.Y.S.3d 383, 106 N.E.3d 766 [2018] ).

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Pritzker and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Golden

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 27, 2022
201 A.D.3d 1253 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Golden

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Whitney GOLDEN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 27, 2022

Citations

201 A.D.3d 1253 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
157 N.Y.S.3d 792

Citing Cases

People v. Atutis

Given the invalid appeal waiver, defendant's claim that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive is not…