From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Girard

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 25, 1969
18 Mich. App. 593 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)

Opinion

Docket No. 6,118.

Decided August 25, 1969. Application for leave to appeal filed September 17, 1969.

Appeal from Wayne, Joseph G. Rashid, J. Submitted Division 1 July 22, 1969, at Detroit. (Docket No. 6,118.) Decided August 25, 1969. Application for leave to appeal filed September 17, 1969.

Donald P. Girard was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of second-degree murder. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Samuel J. Torina, Chief Appellate Lawyer, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

John F. Foley (Defender's Office, Legal Aid and Defender Association of Detroit), for defendant.

Before: J.H. GILLIS, P.J., and V.J. BRENNAN and BRONSON, JJ.


This case is submitted on the People's motion to dismiss or affirm. Defendant was convicted, on a plea of guilty, of the crime of second degree murder (MCLA § 750.317 [Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.549]), and on July 1, 1968, he was sentenced to serve 50 to 60 years in prison. On February 11, 1969, defendant's motion to withdraw the plea of guilty and set aside the conviction was denied. Appellate counsel was requested and a timely appeal was filed alleging that the court failed to comply with GCR 1963, 785.3(2), and that the sentence was excessive, constituting cruel and unjust punishment.

A complete review of the transcript of the plea examination discloses that the court committed no error in accepting the guilty plea, which was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made by the defendant after he had been examined by three psychiatrists and found to be legally sane. The court personally examined defendant on the record and was satisfied that a crime of second degree murder had been established and defendant had participated therein. This examination was consistent with MCLA § 768.35 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1058), GCR 1963, 785.3(2), and People v. Barrows (1959), 358 Mich. 267. Since defendant was represented by counsel, GCR 1963, 785.3(1) has no application. People v. La Roe (1969), 18 Mich. App. 262. There has been no miscarriage of justice. People v. Dunn (1968), 380 Mich. 693, and People v. Winegar (1968), 380 Mich. 719.

In addition, the transcript discloses the court fully complied with the guilty plea requirements set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 395 U.S. 238 ( 89 S Ct 1709, 23 L Ed 2d 274); see also McCarthy v. United States (1969), 394 U.S. 459 ( 89 S Ct 1166, 22 L Ed 2d 418).

Defendant's assertion that the sentence of 50 to 60 years constitutes an abuse of discretion and cruel and unusual punishment will not ordinarily be reviewed by an appellate court when the sentence imposed falls within the statutory limits set by the legislature, as in this case which involves a maximum of life imprisonment. MCLA § 750.317 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.549). See People v. O'Den (1968), 15 Mich. App. 10, 11; People v. Tetts (1967), 6 Mich. App. 254, 259; People v. Pate (1965), 2 Mich. App. 66, 68; and see also People v. Krum (1965), 374 Mich. 356, 362; and People v. Connor (1957), 348 Mich. 456, 463. The case of People v. Murray (1888), 72 Mich. 10, upon which defendant relies, is no longer applicable as it was decided when Michigan did not have an indeterminate sentence law and the defendant was required to serve whatever sentence was imposed unless pardoned. See People v. Earegood (1968), 12 Mich. App. 256, 274.

Motion to affirm is granted.


Summaries of

People v. Girard

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 25, 1969
18 Mich. App. 593 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
Case details for

People v. Girard

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. GIRARD

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 25, 1969

Citations

18 Mich. App. 593 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
171 N.W.2d 567

Citing Cases

People v. Stevens

The sentence in the instant case falls within the statutory limits prescribed by the Legislature and lies…

People v. Oscar Moore

Several subsequent cases have distinguished Murray as involving a fixed sentence at a time when the defendant…