From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Parker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 28, 2017
51 N.Y.S.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

04-28-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Terrance GIBSON, Defendant–Appellant.

Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Kimberly F. Duguay of Counsel), for defendant-appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy Gilligan of Counsel), for respondent.


Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Kimberly F. Duguay of Counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy Gilligan of Counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq. ), defendant contends that County Court erred in assessing points for his criminal history based upon a prior juvenile delinquency adjudication. We agree. Defendant was assessed 15 points under risk factor 9 for a prior crime as a juvenile delinquent, and the court, relying on People v. Catchings, 56 A.D.3d 1181, 1182, 867 N.Y.S.2d 618, lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 701, 876 N.Y.S.2d 348, 904 N.E.2d 503, rejected defendant's challenge to the assessment of points under risk factor 9. As we recently held in People v. Brown, 148 A.D.3d 1705, ––––, 50 N.Y.S.3d 671, however, a juvenile delinquency adjudication may not be considered a crime for purposes of assessing points in a SORA determination, and Catchings should no longer be followed to that extent. Consequently, we conclude that the court erred in considering defendant's juvenile delinquency adjudication in assessing 15 points under risk factor 9.

Removing the improperly assessed points under risk factor 9 renders defendant a presumptive level two risk. Under the circumstances of this case, we remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings to determine whether an upward departure is warranted (see Brown, 148 A.D.3d at ––––, 50 N.Y.S.3d 671 ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings.

SMITH, J.P., CARNI, DeJOSEPH, NEMOYER, and TROUTMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Parker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Apr 28, 2017
51 N.Y.S.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Tyshawn S. PARKER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 28, 2017

Citations

51 N.Y.S.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Citing Cases

People v. Dukes

Such aggravating circumstances must, of course, be proved by admissible evidence (cf.People v. Diaz , 100…

People v. Downer

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERMemorandum:On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to…