Opinion
04-28-2017
Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Kimberly F. Duguay of Counsel), for defendant-appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy Gilligan of Counsel), for respondent.
Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Kimberly F. Duguay of Counsel), for defendant-appellant.
Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy Gilligan of Counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq. ), defendant contends that County Court erred in assessing points for his criminal history based upon a prior juvenile delinquency adjudication. We agree. Defendant was assessed 15 points under risk factor 9 for a prior crime as a juvenile delinquent, and the court, relying on People v. Catchings, 56 A.D.3d 1181, 1182, 867 N.Y.S.2d 618, lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 701, 876 N.Y.S.2d 348, 904 N.E.2d 503, rejected defendant's challenge to the assessment of points under risk factor 9. As we recently held in People v. Brown, 148 A.D.3d 1705, ––––, 50 N.Y.S.3d 671, however, a juvenile delinquency adjudication may not be considered a crime for purposes of assessing points in a SORA determination, and Catchings should no longer be followed to that extent. Consequently, we conclude that the court erred in considering defendant's juvenile delinquency adjudication in assessing 15 points under risk factor 9.
Removing the improperly assessed points under risk factor 9 renders defendant a presumptive level two risk. Under the circumstances of this case, we remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings to determine whether an upward departure is warranted (see Brown, 148 A.D.3d at ––––, 50 N.Y.S.3d 671 ).
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings.
SMITH, J.P., CARNI, DeJOSEPH, NEMOYER, and TROUTMAN, JJ., concur.