From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Giannetti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1985
111 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

June 24, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.).


Judgment affirmed and this case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Defendant's written statement, coupled with Detective Lissenden's testimony regarding defendant's statements made at the police precinct, suffice to show that defendant entered the house in question with the intent to take food from the refrigerator. The fact that defendant offered another explanation for his actions does not require a different finding. The trial court, sitting as the trier of facts, was entitled to accept the testimony which it found credible, and could, in its role as fact finder, disregard defendant's explanation ( People v. Bigelow, 106 A.D.2d 448).

Defendant's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., O'Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Giannetti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1985
111 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Giannetti

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT GIANNETTI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Castro

Here, the jury could have reasonably relied on the police testimony which established that the defendant was…