From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Geraghty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1996
224 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 13, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appellate review of the plea agreements and the sentences imposed (see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1).

We find, however, that the waiver of his right to seek appellate review of the denial of his suppression motions was ineffective.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the lineups were not unduly suggestive (see, People v. Walker, 215 A.D.2d 606; People v. Lopez, 209 A.D.2d 442; People v. Miller, 199 A.D.2d 422; People v. Simmonds, 182 A.D.2d 650).

The defendant's remaining contention regarding the appointment of an interpreter is without merit (see, People v. Navarro, 134 A.D.2d 460; see also, Matter of Catholic Guardian Socy. v. Elba V., 216 A.D.2d 558). Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Geraghty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 13, 1996
224 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Geraghty

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY GERAGHTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 13, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 342

Citing Cases

People v. Nunez

Ordered that the judgment and order are affirmed. The record fails to establish that the defendant knowingly,…