Opinion
52 KA 17–00342
02-02-2018
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mark GEORGE, Jr., Defendant–Appellant.
DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. CAROLINE A. WOJTASZEK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
CAROLINE A. WOJTASZEK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Memorandum:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted rape in the first degree ( Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.35[1] ). We reject defendant's contention that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid. County Court "expressly ascertained from defendant that, as a condition of the plea, he was agreeing to waive his right to appeal, and the court did not conflate that right with those automatically forfeited by a guilty plea" ( People v. McCrea, 140 A.D.3d 1655, 1655, 32 N.Y.S.3d 778 [4th Dept. 2016], lv denied 28 N.Y.3d 933, 40 N.Y.S.3d 361, 63 N.E.3d 81 [2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. Toney, 153 A.D.3d 1583, 1583, 60 N.Y.S.3d 898 [4th Dept. 2017] ). The court also specifically explained to defendant that the waiver encompassed any challenge to the severity of his sentence, thereby foreclosing our review of any such challenge (see Toney, 153 A.D.3d at 1583, 60 N.Y.S.3d 898 ; cf. People v. Maracle, 19 N.Y.3d 925, 928, 950 N.Y.S.2d 498, 973 N.E.2d 1272 [2012] ).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.