From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Genovese

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 14, 1969
249 N.E.2d 762 (N.Y. 1969)

Summary

In People v Genovese (24 N.Y.2d 917), defendants, employees of a chain of drugstores, contended that the police enforced the law only against their employer's drugstores.

Summary of this case from Playtogs Factory Outlet v. County of Orange

Opinion

Submitted April 22, 1969

Decided May 14, 1969

Appeal from the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOAN O'DWYER O'NEILL, J.

Charles K. Finch and Donald F. Reid for appellants.

Thomas J. Mackell, District Attorney ( Peter J. O'Connor and Arthur L. Alexander of counsel), for respondents.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Brenda Soloff of counsel), in his statutory capacity under section 71 of the Executive Law.


Judgments affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and JASEN. Taking no part: Judge KEATING.


Summaries of

People v. Genovese

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 14, 1969
249 N.E.2d 762 (N.Y. 1969)

In People v Genovese (24 N.Y.2d 917), defendants, employees of a chain of drugstores, contended that the police enforced the law only against their employer's drugstores.

Summary of this case from Playtogs Factory Outlet v. County of Orange
Case details for

People v. Genovese

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEONARD GENOVESE et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 14, 1969

Citations

249 N.E.2d 762 (N.Y. 1969)
249 N.E.2d 762
301 N.Y.S.2d 982

Citing Cases

People v. L.A. Witherill, Inc.

Of the several arguments posed by defendant, it is enough to say that a new trial is necessary because the…

People v. Acme Markets

It is axiomatic that where there is no suspect classification or fundamental interest involved, a statute…