From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Genao

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Jun 18, 2020
67 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)

Opinion

571087/18

06-18-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Elvin GENAO, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Joanne B. Watters, J.), rendered on May 31, 2018, affirmed.

Since defendant waived prosecution by information, the accusatory instrument only had to satisfy the reasonable cause requirement of a misdemeanor complaint (see People v. Dumay , 23 NY3d 518, 522 [2014] ). So viewed, the accusatory instrument—comprising the misdemeanor complaint and the domestic incident report signed by complainant—was jurisdictionally valid, since it provided reasonable cause to believe that defendant was guilty of second-degree harassment (see Penal Law § 240.26[1] ), the offense to which he ultimately pleaded guilty. Allegations that defendant, the father of complainant's son, called his son to "tell him bad stuff about" complainant, and then telephoned the complainant and stated "when I see you, I will knock your teeth out," were sufficient at the pleading stage to support a finding that defendant made a "genuine threat" to physically harm complainant ( People v. Dietze , 75 NY2d 47, 54 [1989] ; see Matter of Czop v. Czop , 21 AD3d 958, 959 [2005]; People v. Lopez , 50 Misc 3d 139[A], 2016 NY Slip Op. 50165[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1071 [2016] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

All concur.


Summaries of

People v. Genao

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Jun 18, 2020
67 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
Case details for

People v. Genao

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Elvin Genao…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Jun 18, 2020

Citations

67 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 50700
128 N.Y.S.3d 409

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Nor was the information jurisdictionally defective. Allegations that defendant called the victim and stated…

People v. Williams

Nor was the information jurisdictionally defective. Allegations that defendant called the victim and stated…