From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gaskin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1995
220 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Summary

In People v. Gaskin, 220 AD2d 768 (2nd Dept 1995), appeal denied 87 NY2d 1019 (1996), the defendant acknowledged in his plea allocution that he criminally possessed a handgun for approximately one week before the committed the crime of attempted robbery.

Summary of this case from People v. Cuadrado

Opinion

October 30, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant acknowledged in his plea allocution that he criminally possessed a handgun for approximately one week before he committed the crime of attempted robbery in the first degree. Accordingly, the same act did not provide the basis of his convictions of both crimes and the imposition of consecutive sentences was not prohibited (cf., People v. Ali, 188 A.D.2d 476; People v. Ellis, 139 A.D.2d 662). Mangano, P.J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gaskin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1995
220 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

In People v. Gaskin, 220 AD2d 768 (2nd Dept 1995), appeal denied 87 NY2d 1019 (1996), the defendant acknowledged in his plea allocution that he criminally possessed a handgun for approximately one week before the committed the crime of attempted robbery.

Summary of this case from People v. Cuadrado
Case details for

People v. Gaskin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HUSAYN GASKIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 987

Citing Cases

People v. McBride

In any event, the facts adduced upon the plea allocution were sufficient to establish the defendant's…

People v. Cuadrado

Where the necessary facts are admitted, however, consecutive time may be imposed. In People v. Gaskin, 220…