From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 4, 1991
176 A.D.2d 1230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

October 4, 1991

Appeal from the Ontario County Court, Reed, J.

Present — Callahan, A.P.J., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The prosecutor's reference in his opening statement to defendant's prior conviction for driving while intoxicated does not require reversal because the conviction was a necessary element of the aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle charge (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [3]; People v Miller, 163 A.D.2d 627, 629, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 942; People v Cooper, 158 A.D.2d 743; People v Koponen, 129 A.D.2d 838). Defendant's remaining contentions lack merit.


Summaries of

People v. Gardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 4, 1991
176 A.D.2d 1230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Gardner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN F. GARDNER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 1230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Powlowski

However, the law provides that "[a] person who operates a vehicle in violation of such subdivision after…

People v. Lazzar

That is essentially what the court held in People v Powlowski (172 Misc 2d 240, 242 [1997]) where it stated…