From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ganly

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1916
113 N.E. 1063 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued June 15, 1916

Decided July 11, 1916

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( Edward G. Griffin of counsel), for appellant.

John Kadel for James V. Ganly, as county clerk, respondent.

Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel ( Terence Farley and John Lehman of counsel), for city of New York, respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of SCOTT, J., below.

Concur: HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ. Absent: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J.


Summaries of

People v. Ganly

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1916
113 N.E. 1063 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

People v. Ganly

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v . JAMES V. GANLY, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 11, 1916

Citations

113 N.E. 1063 (N.Y. 1916)
113 N.E. 1063

Citing Cases

Matter of Mugavin v. Nyquist

In other words, on June 8, 1972 when the Legislature adopted said section 5 of chapter 953, most of the…

Matter of McCabe v. Aulls

What further light then does this situation throw upon the intent of the lawmakers? Did the amendment of 1924…