From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1987
130 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 11, 1987

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Harrison, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Contrary to defendant's contention on appeal, he did not enter an Alford plea (North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25) as he did not assert his innocence at either his plea or sentencing proceedings (see, People v. Serrano, 15 N.Y.2d 304). The defendant's motion was properly denied without a hearing (see, CPL 440.10). It cannot be said that the defense counsel's advice to the defendant to accept the plea bargain constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. The defendant obtained a plea bargain which afforded him concurrent rather than consecutive sentences, in addition to the dismissal of a pending indictment and a felony complaint. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 11, 1987
130 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Gale

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JULIUS GALE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 11, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Roots

In any event, we conclude that defendant's contention lacks merit (see People v Hunt, 188 A.D.3d 1648, 1649…

People v. Roots

In any event, we conclude that defendant's contention lacks merit (see People v Hunt, 188 A.D.3d 1648, 1649…