From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fryer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 2003
2 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-03468.

December 29, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Farneti, J.), rendered March 14, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and resisting arrest, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Gregory J. Neilon of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Glenn Green of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ROBERT W. SCHMIDT and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that the court should have adjudicated him a youthful offender is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to object or move to withdraw his plea on this ground ( see People v. Noboa, 280 A.D.2d 558; People v. Brown, 265 A.D.2d 486; People v. Berry, 233 A.D.2d 336).

In any event, the determination to deny youthful offender treatment to the defendant was a provident exercise of discretion ( see People v. Taylor, 302 A.D.2d 480; People v. Wallace, 246 A.D.2d 676).

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, SCHMIDT and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fryer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 2003
2 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Fryer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. TREVOR FRYER, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
769 N.Y.S.2d 746

Citing Cases

People v. Thompson

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed. The defendant's contention that the court improvidently exercised…

People v. Stanley

The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would not receive youthful offender treatment,…