From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Francis

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 26, 1980
409 N.E.2d 946 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued June 6, 1980

Decided June 26, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOSEPH R. CORSO, J.

Harold M. Brown for appellant.

Eugene Gold, District Attorney (Michael J. Halberstam of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The evidence before the jury consisting of the statement of the eyewitness, the medical examiner, as well as the defendant's own statements, even though inconsistent in some measure, were, nevertheless, sufficient to prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt, if viewed most favorable to the People as we are bound to do on this appeal (People v Lagana, 36 N.Y.2d 71, 73, cert den 424 U.S. 942).

We have examined the defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Francis

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 26, 1980
409 N.E.2d 946 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERALD FRANCIS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 26, 1980

Citations

409 N.E.2d 946 (N.Y. 1980)
409 N.E.2d 946
431 N.Y.S.2d 473

Citing Cases

People v. Rivera

In any event, since the elements of the crime upon which defendant now stands convicted were materially…