From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fluellen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 2, 1987
132 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

July 2, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J.).


In the instant case, Mr. Michael Davenport (Mr. Davenport) testified as a witness for the People. The defendant contends that the People were required to disclose to him certain Grand Jury minutes, which contained Mr. Davenport's testimony in another case. We have examined the subject Grand Jury minutes of Mr. Davenport, and find that they do not constitute Rosario material (People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, cert denied 368 U.S. 866), since those minutes refer to an unrelated matter, which occurred a number of years prior to the commission of the instant crimes. As a result of this conclusion, defendant is not entitled to be given those minutes.

We have considered the other points raised by the defendant, and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sandler, J.P., Ross, Milonas, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Fluellen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 2, 1987
132 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Fluellen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. REGINALD FLUELLEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1987

Citations

132 A.D.2d 455 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Lasalle

Since the Court of Appeals decided People v. Rosario ( 9 N.Y.2d 286, cert denied 368 U.S. 866) in 1961 "it…

People v. Gonzalez

In order to be Rosario material, the material at issue must relate to the subject matter of the witness's…