People v. Flowers

Full title: THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NATHANIEL FLOWERS, Defendant and…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Second District, Seventh Division

Date published: Jun 19, 2008

No. B199692 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 19, 2008)

Opinion

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NATHANIEL FLOWERS, Defendant and Appellant. B199692 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Seventh Division June 19, 2008

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA280488

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

THE COURT ^*

* PERLUSS, P.J. WOODS, J. ZELON, J.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 10, 2008, and not certified for publication, be modified as follows:

On page 11, the third full paragraph concludes with the sentence: “Thus, given the nature and amount of this gang evidence at issue, relative to the other evidence, presented at trial, we are convinced under either the state or federal standards of prejudicial error that reversal is warranted.”

It should read: “Thus, given the nature and amount of this gang evidence at issue, relative to the other evidence, presented at trial, we are convinced under either the state or federal standards of prejudicial error that reversal is unwarranted.”

The foregoing does not effect a change in the judgment.