From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Flower

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 1951
279 App. Div. 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

November 5, 1951.

Appeal from County Court of Nassau County.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. The record does not establish any violation of section 385 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Cf. People v. Elliott, 66 App. Div. 179, affd. 172 N.Y. 146.) We are of the opinion, also, that the court's charge as to the effect to be given character evidence was in substantial compliance with the rule stated in People v. Trimarchi ( 231 N.Y. 263, 266). In any event, there was no exception to that instruction; and even if it be assumed that it was erroneous, a new trial is not necessitated under section 527 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as defendant's guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt. (Cf. People v. Robbins, 278 App. Div. 592, affd. 302 N.Y. 885.) The other claims of error advanced by defendant have been examined and are similarly without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Flower

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 5, 1951
279 App. Div. 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

People v. Flower

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT L. FLOWER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

People v. Hamlin

People v. La Marca ( 4 N.Y.2d 925) concerns permission to appeal from an order denying a writ of error coram…