From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Finn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2009
63 A.D.3d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2007-10182.

June 2, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered October 24, 2007, convicting her of burglary in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Abbie Goldbas, Utica, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Lauren E. Dunnock and Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.

Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that her plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review since she did not move to withdraw her plea of guilty prior to sentencing ( see CPL 220.60; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Kornegay, 60 AD3d 696; People v LeGrady, 50 AD3d 1059, 1060; People v Ramsey, 49 AD3d 565). Although the defendant made a post-conviction motion pursuant to CPL article 440 to vacate the judgment, the issues raised in that motion are not properly before us on this direct appeal ( see People v DaCosta, 217 AD2d 661, 662; People v Esposito, 157 AD2d 850). In any event, we find that the plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent ( see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17).

The defendant's claim that she did not receive the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. We find that the defendant was afforded meaningful representation ( see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147).


Summaries of

People v. Finn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 2009
63 A.D.3d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Finn

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KYA FINN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 755 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4441
879 N.Y.S.2d 720

Citing Cases

People v. Marcinak

We agree with the defendant's contention that the purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid ( see…

People v. Outar

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by…