From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 20, 2000
274 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

July 20, 2000.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered November 20, 1996, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of sodomy in the first degree (three counts), sexual abuse in the first degree, endangering the welfare of a child (two counts) and use of a child in a sexual performance.

Eugene P. Devine, Public Defender (Shannon K. Geraty of counsel), Albany, for appellant.

Sol Greenberg, District Attorney (Kimberly A. Mariani of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant was charged in a 10-count indictment and a four-count indictment with various crimes involving the molestation of three victims, all under 11 years of age. In satisfaction of these indictments, defendant ultimately pleaded guilty to three counts of sodomy in the first degree, two counts of endangering the welfare of a child, as well as one count each of sexual abuse in the first degree and use of child in a sexual performance. Pursuant to the negotiated plea agreement, defendant waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant to an aggregate prison term of 20 to 60 years.

We note that defendant's actual maximum term would be limited to 50 years by operation of law (see, Penal Law § 70.30 [1] [e] [vi]).

Defendant now appeals, principally arguing that his negotiated sentence was harsh and excessive. Inasmuch as defendant waived his right to appeal as part of a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty, this issue has not been preserved for our review (see, People v. Buchanan, 236 A.D.2d 741,lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1032). Nevertheless, were we to reach this issue, we would find no evidence of extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification of the sentence imposed given the repulsive and exploitive nature of the subject crimes, committed by defendant upon innocent children who had every reason to trust him (see, People v. Crane, 242 A.D.2d 783).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 20, 2000
274 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TOM FERGUSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 20, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

People v. Lanahan

We find County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as it was untimely, having been…

People v. Carpenter

Defendant appeals, contending that the sentence imposed was harsh or excessive. Because defendant waived all…