From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 2004
5 A.D.3d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3153.

Decided March 18, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Stone, J. at hearing; James Yates, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered June 13, 2002, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4½ to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Benjamin Cheeks, for Respondent.

Sheilah Fernandez, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Gonzalez, JJ.


The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The police had, at the very least, reasonable suspicion to detain defendant for a confirmatory identification by an undercover officer, since defendant fit the description of a person who had sold drugs to the undercover officer moments before and was discovered in the very spot described by that officer. The description, which featured a particular article of clothing, was sufficiently specific, given the close spatial and temporal factors and the fact that defendant was the only person present who met the description ( see e.g. People v. Rampersant, 272 A.D.2d 202, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 870).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 2004
5 A.D.3d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY FERGUSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
773 N.Y.S.2d 292

Citing Cases

People v. Mack

The radioed message reported a drug buy at a described location, and that there were two perpetrators, one…

People v. Hicks

The fact that the defendant was in the company of the police did not render the showup constitutionally…