From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1997
240 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 9, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Having made only a general motion for a trial order of dismissal, the defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his present claim that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of depraved mind murder (Penal Law § 125.25; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10; People v Stahl, 53 N.Y.2d 1048; People v. Tallarine, 223 A.D.2d 738). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

Pizzuto, J.P., Santucci, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1997
240 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GREGORY FERGUSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 510 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 134

Citing Cases

People v. Vaughn

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of depraved…

People v. Epps

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a…