From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Felix

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 22, 1994
207 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 22, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Altman, J.).


Defendant's absence from two voir dire sidebar conferences with prospective jurors provides no basis for reversal of his conviction since People v. Sloan ( 79 N.Y.2d 386) applies prospectively only (People v. Sprowal, 84 N.Y.2d 113).

Defendant's argument that the People improperly bolstered the complainants' identification testimony is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law, and we decline to review in the interest of justice (CPL 470.05). If we were to review it, we would find that while it was error to admit the evidence of the complainants' pretrial identification of defendant's accomplice (People v. Rosario, 127 A.D.2d 209), the error was harmless.

Defendant also failed to preserve his argument that the court's identification charge was inadequate (CPL 470.05). In any event, if we were to review the charge in the interest of justice, we would find that it was proper, the jury having been appropriately instructed on evaluating the credibility of witnesses and that the People had to prove identification beyond a reasonable doubt (People v. Whalen, 59 N.Y.2d 273, 279).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Rubin and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Felix

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 22, 1994
207 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Felix

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL FELIX…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 22, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 614

Citing Cases

People v. Samuels

Nevertheless, since there must be a new trial, we note that the testimony was erroneously admitted. The…

People v. Morant

Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court appropriately exercised its discretion in the…