From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Estrada

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Jan 11, 1938
24 Cal.App.2d 341 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)

Opinion

Docket No. 1997.

January 11, 1938.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. A.F. Bray, Judge. Appeal dismissed on motion.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Gladstein, Grossman Margolis for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Seibert L. Sefton, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


Respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that appellants have failed to comply with the provisions of rule II, section 7, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

Appellants were sentenced on October 26, 1937, and thereupon gave oral notice of appeal. The clerk's certificate, made on November 7, 1937, shows that up to that time no application had been filed as provided in the above-mentioned rule. [1] Said rule requires that "the appellant, must, within five days after giving notice of appeal, file with the clerk and present an application to the trial court, stating in general terms the grounds of appeal and the points upon which the appellant relies, and designate what portions of the phonographic reporter's notes it will be necessary to have transcribed to fairly present the points relied upon. If such application is not filed within said time, the appeal shall be dismissed; . . ."

The authorities hold that the provisions of the rule are mandatory and that "where the defendant fails to conform with this rule . . ., the appellate court is without jurisdiction to consider his appeal". ( People v. Lewis, 219 Cal. 410, 414 [ 27 P.2d 73, 74]; People v. Nichols, 114 Cal.App. 136, 137 [ 299 P. 752]; People v. Schroeder, 112 Cal.App. 550, 552 [ 297 P. 105].) It is further held that an appellant, who fails to file the application within the time prescribed in the rule, may not obtain relief under the provisions of section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure. ( Gonzales v. Superior Court, 3 Cal. (2d) 260 [ 44 P.2d 320].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Nourse, P.J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 10, 1938.


Summaries of

People v. Estrada

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two
Jan 11, 1938
24 Cal.App.2d 341 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
Case details for

People v. Estrada

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. FRANK ESTRADA et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two

Date published: Jan 11, 1938

Citations

24 Cal.App.2d 341 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938)
74 P.2d 1084

Citing Cases

People v. O'Neal

The record does not support the appellants' contentions regarding the incompetency of their counsel. [9] As…

Lack v. Borsum

That the State has power to enact such regulations for the sale of securities is well established. Hall v.…