Opinion
2013-06-5
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Weldon J. ERVIN, appellant.
Martin Geoffrey Goldberg, Franklin Square, N.Y., for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Barbara Kornblau of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.
Martin Geoffrey Goldberg, Franklin Square, N.Y., for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Barbara Kornblau of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ayres, J.), rendered April 30, 2012, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which he moves to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
ORDERED that the motion of Martin Geoffrey Goldberg for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the appellant's new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,
ORDERED that Mark Diamond, Box 287356, Yorkville Station, New York, N.Y., 10128, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant's new assigned counsel; and it is further,
ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated August 14, 2012, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.
The brief submitted by the appellant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 is deficient because it does not contain an adequate statement of facts and fails to adequately analyze potential appellate issues or highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeal ( see People v. Singleton, 101 A.D.3d 909, 910, 954 N.Y.S.2d 910;People v. Gonzalez, 100 A.D.3d 921, 922, 953 N.Y.S.2d 897;People v. Ovalle, 99 A.D.3d 1023, 1024, 952 N.Y.S.2d 466;Matter of Giovanni S. [ Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252, 256, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676). Since the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel acted “as an active advocate on behalf of his ... client” (Matter of Giovanni S. [ Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d at 256, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 [internal quotation marks omitted]) or that he diligently examined the record, we must assign new counsel to represent the appellant ( see People v. Singleton, 101 A.D.3d at 910, 954 N.Y.S.2d 910;People v. Gonzalez, 100 A.D.3d at 922, 953 N.Y.S.2d 897;People v. Ovalle, 99 A.D.3d at 1024, 952 N.Y.S.2d 466;Matter of Giovanni S. [ Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d at 258, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676).