From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Eric Corona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1996
232 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 28, 1996.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), rendered October 12, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Thompson, J.P., Pizzuto, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ( see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). A jury may convict a person of criminal sale of a controlled substance even though, as here, no prerecorded money or controlled substances were recovered ( see, People v Vickers, 111 AD2d 608; People v Brown, 208 AD2d 414). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Eric Corona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1996
232 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Eric Corona

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIC CORONA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 1010

Citing Cases

People v. Francis

05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to…

People v. Deleon

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the…