From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Erali

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 22, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

At the plea proceeding, the court advised the defendant that as part of the plea agreement, he would receive a term of six months incarceration as a condition of a sentence of five years probation. The court further indicated however that if the defendant failed to appear when he was directed to do so, the court could sentence him to "up to four years". Thereafter, the defendant failed to appear on the date originally scheduled for sentencing and was eventually returned three years later pursuant to a bench warrant. At sentencing, the defendant failed to provide an adequate reason for his failure to appear and the court sentenced him to an indeterminate term of one and one-third to four years imprisonment.

Under these circumstances and in view of the defendant's repeated convictions of driving while intoxicated, we conclude that the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Erali

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Erali

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT J. ERALI, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 665 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 984

Citing Cases

People v. Bradley

15); People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury's opportunity to…

People v. Alleyne

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. Given the defendant's repeated convictions for driving while…