Opinion
April 14, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brownstein, J.).
Appeal dismissed as academic.
The defendant has already served the term of imprisonment imposed upon resentence.
The issues sought to be raised regarding the underlying conviction are not properly before us on this purported appeal from the resentence. The defendant had an opportunity to raise these claims on his prior appeals to this court. In fact, two of the three claims were previously raised and were found to be without merit. Weinstein, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.