From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. English

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 2009
60 A.D.3d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-02621.

March 24, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated February 20, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Belen, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court's determination to assess him 15 points under risk factor 14 for release without supervision was proper inasmuch as he is not under supervision in New York for his sex offenses in Florida and Nevada, and did not successfully complete his probation in Florida before reoffending in Nevada ( see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 17 [2006]; People v Leeks, 43 AD3d 1251, 1252).


Summaries of

People v. English

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 2009
60 A.D.3d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. English

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS ENGLISH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2343
874 N.Y.S.2d 818

Citing Cases

People v. Torres-Ordonez

"An offender who is released without ... supervision is assessed points in this category" (SORA Commentary at…

People v. Torres-Ordonez

The level of supervision/no supervision is an objective consideration (See, People v. Oliver, 137 A.D.3d…