From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ely

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jul 29, 1971
35 Mich. App. 390 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. 10272.

Decided July 29, 1971. Leave to appeal denied, 386 Mich. 759.

Appeal from Recorder's Court of Detroit, Frank G. Schemanske, J. Submitted Division 1 June 15, 1971, at Detroit. (Docket No. 10272.) Decided July 29, 1971. Leave to appeal denied, 386 Mich. 759.

Allen Ely was convicted of manslaughter. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Thomas P. Smith, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Carl Ziemba, for defendant on appeal.

Before: T.M. BURNS, P.J., and HOLBROOK and McGREGOR, JJ.


Having been charged with second-degree murder, MCLA § 750.317 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.549), defendant was convicted upon a jury verdict of manslaughter, MCLA § 750.321 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.553), and was sentenced to 7 to 15 years in prison. Defendant appeals as of right, raising four instances of alleged error.

First, defendant claims error in the admission of the testimony of the Wayne County Medical Examiner, who related the results of an autopsy which he had not attended. Defendant admits that no objection was ever made to this testimony and that, in fact, defense counsel proceeded to cross-examine the medical examiner. Although the admission of some hearsay testimony to establish the cause of death may be error, this was harmless error, since no real dispute existed as to the cause of death. People v. Hall (1970), 24 Mich. App. 509, 512.

Second, defendant asserts that plaintiff abridged his right to remain silent by cross-examining him on his failure to tell the police where he had disposed of the murder weapon. However, no objection was voiced at trial and no motion to strike was made. In the absence of manifest injustice, we decline review. People v. Ramsey (1970), 25 Mich. App. 576, 578; People v. Willis (1965), 1 Mich. App. 428.

Third, we find no prejudice in the prosecutor's remarks which would require reversal.

Fourth, defendant contends now, for the first time, that lack of clarity in the trial court's instructions on the issue of self-defense gives rise to reversible prejudice even in the absence of contemporaneous objection.

It is well established that, in the absence of otherwise essential objection or request, we correct only miscarriages of justice. MCLA § 769.26 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1096). Further, we do not search out singularly objectionable excerpts from the instructions; we must review the instructions as a whole. People v. Dye (1959), 356 Mich. 271, 279; People v. Iron (1970), 26 Mich. App. 235, 241. Examination of the instructions as a whole reveals no lack of clarity amounting to reversible error.

GCR 1963, 516.2; People v. Lewis (1970), 26 Mich. App. 290; People v. Allar (1969), 19 Mich. App. 675.

The defendant having demonstrated no error requiring reversal, the trial court is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Ely

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jul 29, 1971
35 Mich. App. 390 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

People v. Ely

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. ELY

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 29, 1971

Citations

35 Mich. App. 390 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
192 N.W.2d 662

Citing Cases

People v. Martin

This alleged exculpatory statement made by Perry to the police officer did not belong in the prosecution's…

People v. Hooper

People v Dye, 356 Mich. 271; 96 N.W.2d 788 (1959); People v Iron, 26 Mich. App. 235; 182 N.W.2d 342 (1970). A…