From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Edwards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 20, 2001
286 A.D.2d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: September 20, 2001.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett III, J.), rendered April 28, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of murder in the first degree.

Mlynarski Cawley P.C. (Joseph F. Cawley Jr. of counsel), Binghamton, for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Robin A. Forshaw of counsel), New York City, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


In our prior decision ( 274 A.D.2d 754), we reversed the judgment of conviction entered upon defendant's guilty plea to the crime of murder in the first degree after determining that it was invalid pursuant to the holding in Matter of Hynes v. Tomei ( 92 N.Y.2d 613, cert denied 527 U.S. 1015). We, therefore, vacated defendant's sentence and restored the parties to their preplea position by reinstating the notice of intent to seek the death penalty. Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed that determination ( 96 N.Y.2d 445) and remitted the case to us "to conduct, in the exercise of [our] factual review powers and [our] interests of justice jurisdiction, the necessary review of the record" (id., at slip opn p 15).

Having concluded a further review of the record, we find that defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. We further find that defendant, represented by counsel, entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea supported by evidence of guilt and he was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement. We further note that defendant's contentions concerning the suppression of his statements were previously reviewed and found to be unavailing ( 274 A.D.2d 754, supra).

Finally, under the circumstances herein, we discern no basis for this Court to exercise its interest of justice jurisdiction (see, CPL 470.15) and decline further review. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Edwards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 20, 2001
286 A.D.2d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL EDWARDS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 20, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
730 N.Y.S.2d 260