From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Eddinger

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 22, 1925
207 N.W. 161 (Mich. 1925)

Opinion

Docket No. 132.

Submitted October 15, 1925.

Decided December 22, 1925.

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids; Verdier (Leonard D.), J. Submitted October 15, 1925. (Docket No. 132.) Decided December 22, 1925.

Harry Eddinger was convicted of breaking and entering a store, and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than 6 nor more than 15 years in the State prison at Jackson. Reversed.

Michael Garvey, for appellant.

Andrew B. Dougherty, Attorney General, and Earl W. Munshaw, Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.


This defendant was implicated in the same transaction as was the defendant in People v. Frencavage, 231 Mich. 242. They were jointly complained against, and the information against this defendant is in the same language as the information against Frencavage. In that case we held that the information was bad and for that reason reversed the judgment, but inasmuch as there was a good complaint and a waiver of examination we remanded the case for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion. This case is controlled by the opinion in that case and must take the same course. It is so conceded by the learned prosecuting attorney.

For the reason stated in the opinion in that case the judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with that opinion. Defendant will be remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Kent county.

McDONALD, C.J., and CLARK, BIRD, SHARPE, MOORE, STEERE, and WIEST, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Eddinger

Supreme Court of Michigan
Dec 22, 1925
207 N.W. 161 (Mich. 1925)
Case details for

People v. Eddinger

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. EDDINGER

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Dec 22, 1925

Citations

207 N.W. 161 (Mich. 1925)
207 N.W. 161

Citing Cases

State v. Swanson

This error may be corrected by the trial court upon remand of the case. Territory v. Conrad, 1 Dak. 363, 46…

State v. Steffenson

It, furthermore, conforms to the requirement that "where the statute imposes an additional penalty for…