From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dycha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 16, 1983
98 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

December 16, 1983

Appeal from the Erie County Court, La Mendola, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Boomer, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The results of a blood test which indicated that there was .19% by weight of alcohol in defendant's bloodstream within two hours after a fatal traffic accident were properly admitted at defendant's trial for criminally negligent homicide; however, we base our determination on a ground different from that relied on by County Court. The testimony at the suppression hearing indicates that defendant, although initially refusing to take a blood test, consented to it after being advised of the consequences of his refusal and consulting with his brother. Detective Orlikowski testified that he personally witnessed defendant give his consent. That testimony was unrefuted, defendant testifying only that he did not recall giving such consent. Results of a blood test taken with defendant's consent are admissible in a prosecution under the Penal Law (see People v. Magiera, 97 A.D.2d 963).


Summaries of

People v. Dycha

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 16, 1983
98 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

People v. Dycha

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD J. DYCHA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 16, 1983

Citations

98 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

People v. Snyder

Accordingly, dismissal of that count of the indictment founded solely on such evidence was mandated by CPL…

People v. Carroll

Memorandum: The hearing court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the results of a test which…