From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1992
179 A.D.2d 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 27, 1992

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Weissman, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial under Indictment No. 1229/87 (see, CPL 30.20; People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442). The People have indicated that the delay was caused by court congestion. In light of the facts that there was no extended period of pretrial incarceration and that there is no indication in the record that the defense has been impaired by reason of the delay, we see no basis to dismiss the indictment (see, People v. Watts, 57 N.Y.2d 299). Bracken, J.P., Harwood, Lawrence and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 1992
179 A.D.2d 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Dury

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN DURY, Also Known…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Ramlall

In order to determine whether a defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial pursuant…

People v. Perez

In order to determine whether a defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial pursuant…