From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Durgin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 24, 1976
53 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

June 24, 1976


Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County, rendered April 12, 1974, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of the crime of robbery in the first degree. The sentence of an indeterminate term of not more than six years for armed robbery cannot be said to amount to a clear abuse of discretion (People v Dittmar, 41 A.D.2d 788; People v Caputo, 13 A.D.2d 861). Nor do the mandatory sentence provisions of section 70.00 Penal of the Penal Law violate the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution (People v Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100). The logic in Broadie is equally applicable to convictions for armed robbery as for drug felonies. Judgment affirmed. Koreman, P.J., Kane, Main, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Durgin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 24, 1976
53 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Durgin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD E. DURGIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1976

Citations

53 A.D.2d 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)