From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dunbar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1999
260 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 26, 1999

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Angiolillo, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. The defendant's conclusory and unsupported assertion of innocence, and claim that he was pressured into pleading guilty, did not warrant vacating his plea (see, People v. Barnett, 258 A.D.2d 526; People v. Quijada-Lopez, 256 A.D.2d 478). Additionally, his contention that his medication made it impossible for him to understand and appreciate the proceedings is contradicted by the record of the plea proceedings (see, People v. Quijada-Lopez, supra; People v. DeLeon, 254 A.D.2d 430; People v. Waters, 252 A.D.2d 564).

Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dunbar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1999
260 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Dunbar

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MELVIN DUNBAR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 644 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 271

Citing Cases

People v. White

The People have ably distinguished each of these cases. Based upon the foregoing, the defendant's application…

People v. Potter

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and…