Opinion
November 3, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We agree with the defendant's contention, as conceded by the People, that his purported waiver of his right to appeal, made as a condition of his plea of guilty, was ineffective. The court made no inquiry on the record as to whether the defendant understood the implications of the waiver ( see, People v McCaskell, 206 A.D.2d 547). Furthermore, the court wholly failed to explain to the defendant the extent of the appellate rights he would be required to waive ( see, People v. Bryant, 225 A.D.2d 786). Inasmuch as the record is insufficient to find the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal to have been knowing, intelligent, and voluntary ( see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273), his present contentions challenging the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence are properly presented for our review ( see, People v Cohen, 210 A.D.2d 343).
Nevertheless, the court correctly denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was to suppress a gun recovered incident to his arrest. The court's determination rested largely upon its assessment of the credibility of the testifying officer and is entitled to great deference ( see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 769). Since the court's conclusion is amply supported by the credible evidence adduced at the suppression hearing, it need not be disturbed ( see, People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
O'Brien, J. P., Thompson, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.