From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Donaldson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 2009
66 A.D.3d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2005-07792.

October 13, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Donnino, J.), dated June 17, 2005, which, after a hearing to redetermine his sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki ( 3 F Supp 2d 456), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Kent V. Moston, Hempstead, N.Y. (Jeremy L. Goldberg and Dori Cohen of counsel), for appellant.

Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Robert A. Schwartz and Michael E. Soffer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Florio, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant failed to show, by clear and convincing evidence, that special circumstances existed warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level three designation. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in designating him a level three sex offender ( see People v Ainoris, 57 AD3d 864; People v Bowens, 55 AD3d 809, 810; People v Windham, 37 AD3d 571, affd 10 NY3d 801; People v Morales, 33 AD3d 982, 983).


Summaries of

People v. Donaldson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 2009
66 A.D.3d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Donaldson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN L. DONALDSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 13, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7386
886 N.Y.S.2d 359

Citing Cases

People v. Padro

The defendant failed to demonstrate that certain mitigating factors existed warranting a downward departure…