From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 1993
197 A.D.2d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 7, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence H. Bernstein, J.).


Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v. Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), we find that the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to establish defendant's identity as the seller beyond a reasonable doubt. The absence of prerecorded buy money or additional drugs at the time of arrest does not negate guilt (People v. Walker, 186 A.D.2d 62, 63, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 767). Moreover, the issues of the lighting conditions and the undercover's preparation of the police report are matters appropriately left for the jury.

We note that the jury deliberated for many hours after the Allen charge before rendering its verdict, negating the contention that the charge was coercive (see, People v. Glover, 165 A.D.2d 761, 763, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 877).

We have considered defendant's remaining claims and find them meritless.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Diaz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 1993
197 A.D.2d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JESUS DIAZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 379 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 138

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

UC 22152 drove by within minutes and made a confirmatory identification, and also identified defendant later…

People v. Whetstone

We disagree. The court's charge was neutral, directed to the jurors in general, and did not coerce a verdict…