From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Deyo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1998
252 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 2, 1998

Appeal from the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.).


Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to the crimes of kidnapping in the second degree and rape in the first degree of his estranged wife. Although defendant contends on appeal that his sentence of concurrent prison terms of 4 to 12 years was disproportionately harsh and should be reduced in the interest of justice, we cannot agree. Defendant derived a substantial benefit from the plea bargain in that his guilty plea was in full satisfaction of a nine-count indictment. Moreover, the sentence imposed was recommended by the People pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement and was less than the harshest sentence he could have received (see, Penal Law § 70.02 [a]). These factors, together with the violent nature of defendant's crime and the lack of extraordinary circumstance warranting our intervention in the interest of justice, lead us to conclude that the sentence imposed by County Court should be left undisturbed (see, People v. Russell, 249 A.D.2d 628; People v. Granger, 82 A.D.2d 643).

Mercure, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Spain, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Deyo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 1998
252 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Deyo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH J. DEYO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 619

Citing Cases

People v. Rettig

Defendant contends on appeal that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive given his troubled childhood…