From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Delgado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 2004
4 A.D.3d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2973.

Decided February 26, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered March 21, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Beth Fisch Cohen, for Respondent.

Bonnie C. Brennan, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Lerner, JJ.


The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record ( see People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761). The police were entitled to pursue defendant when he fled after committing a violation in their presence ( see People v. Bothwell, 261 A.D.2d 232, 234-235, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 1026).

In addition to being waived by his guilty plea ( People v. Mercado, 265 A.D.2d 177, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 826; People v. Rojas, 169 A.D.2d 464, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 966), defendant's Rosario claim is both unpreserved ( People v. Pines, 298 A.D.2d 179, lv denied 99 N.Y.2d 562) and unsupported by the record.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Delgado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 2004
4 A.D.3d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Delgado

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. UMAR DELGADO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 666

Citing Cases

People v. Simms

There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (…

People v. Neely

Defendant's other arguments are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we…