From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dejesus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 2007
46 A.D.3d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2362 2684/04.

December 13, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered February 23, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the first degree (three counts), murder in the second degree and conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing her to an aggregate term of life without parole, unanimously affirmed.

Jeremy Gutman, New York, for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Susan Axelrod of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.


Defendant was convicted of hiring other persons to kill her husband's ex-wife. In carrying out the planned murder, the other persons, acting on their own accord, deliberately killed a second person who happened to be present in the intended victim's apartment. With respect to the latter killing, defendant did not preserve her challenge to her conviction of first-degree murder under a murder-for-hire theory (Penal Law § 125.27 [a] [vi]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that she was properly convicted under that theory ( People v Powell, 304 AD2d 410, 411 lv denied 1 NY3d 578 [transferred intent theory applied where the wrong person was killed in a murder-for-hire scheme]).

There was overwhelming evidence supporting that count, as well as the remaining counts, and there is no merit to defendant's claim that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. The accomplice testimony was thoroughly corroborated by a lengthy chain of additional evidence.

Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that defendant's argument that the prosecutor acted as an unsworn witness is without merit, and that any error under CPL 60.35 with respect to the prosecution's impeachment of one of its own witnesses was harmless .


Summaries of

People v. Dejesus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 2007
46 A.D.3d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Dejesus

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. MARIA DEJESUS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 2007

Citations

46 A.D.3d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9891
847 N.Y.S.2d 191

Citing Cases

People v. Lynch

In addition, defendant was not denied a fair trial when the prosecutor made an isolated comment that in…

People v. Dejesus

February 29, 2008. Appeal from the 1st Dept: 46 AD3d 325 (NY). Graffeo,…