From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. DE PASQUALE

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 31, 1967
54 Misc. 2d 91 (N.Y. App. Term 1967)

Opinion

May 31, 1967

Appeal from the District Court of the County of Nassau, WILLIS B. CARMAN, J.

Jerome Lewis for appellant.

William Cahn, District Attorney ( Jules E. Orenstein of counsel), for respondent.


Although the judgment of conviction is affirmed, the attention of the Bar is nevertheless called to the following: In this case the prosecutor, in summation, in answer to the statements in defense summation that the main prosecution witness was a liar, stated that his "Christian background precludes (him) from accusing another human being of being a liar", and on a few occasions he begged the Lord's forgiveness for having to use the word God in repeating testimony in which it was used. Reference to race, nationality or religion may be prejudicial even though not intended that way, and should be eschewed unless in connection with a matter in issue and unavoidable.

The judgment of conviction should be affirmed.

Concur — DI GIOVANNA, RITCHIE and SHAPIRO, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. DE PASQUALE

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
May 31, 1967
54 Misc. 2d 91 (N.Y. App. Term 1967)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. DE PASQUALE

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEPHEN DE PASQUALE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 1967

Citations

54 Misc. 2d 91 (N.Y. App. Term 1967)
281 N.Y.S.2d 963

Citing Cases

People v. Wood

CPLR 2309, applicable in criminal trials as well as civil (CPL 60.10), by its terms contemplates an…

People v. Connette

He may not, for instance, try to convey to the jury, by insinuation, suggestion or speculation, the…