From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. De Mino

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 602 (N.Y. 1971)

Opinion

Argued June 10, 1971

Decided July 7, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, DOMINIC S. RINALDI, J.

Joel Berger and Robert Kasanof for appellant.

Eugene Gold, District Attorney ( Aaron Nussbaum of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed in the following memorandum: There was no showing of actual prejudice beyond the fact of the retrial itself, to which the defense — differing from that in Price v. Georgia ( 398 U.S. 323) — interposed no objection (see People ex rel. Williams v. Follette, 30 A.D.2d 693, affd. 24 N.Y.2d 949; People ex rel. Elias v. Follette, 32 A.D.2d 929, mot. for lv. to app. den. 25 N.Y.2d 742).

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

People v. De Mino

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 602 (N.Y. 1971)
Case details for

People v. De Mino

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BOLDASSARO DE MINO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1971

Citations

29 N.Y.2d 602 (N.Y. 1971)
324 N.Y.S.2d 402
273 N.E.2d 133

Citing Cases

People v. La Ruffa

Presently, the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment of the Federal Constitution is applicable to the…

People v. La Ruffa

While it is true that the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment is applicable to the States through…