From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dawkins

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 18, 2017
146 A.D.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

01-18-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michael DAWKINS, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Gregory Musso on the brief), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Gregory Musso on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Donnelly, J.), imposed September 3, 2015, upon his conviction of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v. Dawkins, 131 A.D.3d 482, 13 N.Y.S.3d 908 ).

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant's purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ), and, thus, does not preclude review of his claim that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment (cf. People v. Pacherille, 25 N.Y.3d 1021, 1024, 10 N.Y.S.3d 178, 32 N.E.3d 393 ).

" ‘The determination of whether to grant or deny youthful offender status rests within the sound discretion of the court and depends upon all the attending facts and circumstances of the case’ " (People v. Mullings, 83 A.D.3d 871, 872, 921 N.Y.S.2d 152, quoting People v. Ortega, 114 A.D.2d 912, 912, 495 N.Y.S.2d 82 ). Here, contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant youthful offender treatment (see CPL 720.20[1] ; People v. Green, 110 A.D.3d 825, 826, 973 N.Y.S.2d 679 ; People v. Williams, 110 A.D.3d 746, 747, 972 N.Y.S.2d 94 ; People v. Certain, 108 A.D.3d 681, 968 N.Y.S.2d 400 ).

RIVERA, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dawkins

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 18, 2017
146 A.D.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Dawkins

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michael DAWKINS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 18, 2017

Citations

146 A.D.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 317
44 N.Y.S.3d 770

Citing Cases

People v. Lormil

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed." ‘The determination of whether to grant or deny youthful offender…

People v. Lormil

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed. " The determination of whether to grant or deny youthful offender…